|
Study Guide |
|
|
. Plot Summary By Michael J. Cummings...© 2003 ........When General Titus Andronicus returns to Rome after defeating the Goths in a ten-year campaign, the citizens hail him as a hero. Among his captives are the Queen of the Goths, Tamora, and her three sons, Alarbus, Demetrius, and Chiron. Also accompanying her is her lover Aaron, a Moor. Titus has lost many sons in the war and, when the tomb of the Andronicus family is opened to receive the bodies, Titus grieves deeply, saying: O sacred receptacle of my joys,1........To give them a fitting funeral, Lucius, one of Titus’s three living sons, suggests a human sacrifice. Titus singles out Alarbus, Tamora’s eldest son. She pleads for her son’s life: Victorious Titus, rue the tears I shed,........Titus replies that “die he must, / To appease their groaning shadows that are gone” (1. 1. 130-131). Lucius and attendants seize Alarbus and remove him to his place of execution. There, they hew his limbs and “feed the sacrificing fire” (1. 1. 150). The death of ........Meanwhile, it so happens that the imperial crown is up for grabs, the emperor having just died. When it is offered to Titus, he refuses it, saying he “shakes for age and feebleness” (1. 1. 196), and recommends Saturninus, the oldest son of the dead emperor, for the crown. Titus also recommends that Saturninus choose Lavinia, Titus’s daughter, as his wife and empress. ........After Saturninus becomes emperor, he frees Tamora and her sons, for the queen has captivated him. Then Bassianus, the brother of Saturninus, objects to the proposed marriage of Saturninus and Lavinia because Lavinia is betrothed to him. With the help of Lavinia’s brothers, he steals her away. Titus is angry–so angry that he kills his son Mucius when he bars Titus from pursuing the lovers. Later, Saturninus decides that he fancies Tamora more than Lavinia, then marries Tamora and makes her empress. Tamora begins plotting revenge against Titus for allowing the slaughter of her son. Before the palace, Tamora’s lover, Aaron, exalts Tamora, describes how he will serve her and “wanton” her, and predicts that she will bring ruin to Rome, saying, I will be bright, and shine in pearl and gold,........Tamora’s sons Demetrius and Chiron quarrel over Lavinia. Each has fallen in love with her, and each plans to claim the right to take her from Bassianus. After failing to dissuade them from pursuing her, Aaron suggests that they share the lovely Lavinia by taking turns raping her in the seclusion of a forest. The occasion will come during a hunt in the woods for game. Emperor Saturninus, Queen Tamora, and many others are to take part in the hunt. On the day of the hunt, Aaron and Tamora rendezvous in the woods. Tamora speaks of her desire that they may soon lie down “wreathed in each other’s arms / [and] . . . possess a golden slumber'' (2. 3. 29-30). Aaron confides to her that he is preoccupied with seeking revenge against their enemies, then gives her a letter she is to present to Saturninus. Its contents will abet Tamora’s desire to bring down Titus. ........When Bassianus and Lavinia discover Aaron and Tamora together, Tamora fears that the intruders will tattletale to the emperor. So she calls out for her sons. When they arrive, Tamora pretends Bassianus has threatened her. Ever ready to defend mommy dearest, the sons kill Bassianus, dump him in a pit, then drag Lavinia off to satisfy their lust. But not only do they rape her, they also mutilate her, cutting off her hands and tearing out her tongue. Aaron leads Titus’s sons Quintus and Martius to the pit where Bassianus lies dead under cover of brush. Martius falls in. While Aaron goes to fetch Saturninus, Quintus falls in, too, trying to rescue Martius. Saturninus arrives with Aaron. With them are Titus, Lucius, and attendants. Martius, who has discovered the body, informs Saturninus that his brother, Bassianus, is dead. Tamora then presents Aaron’s letter to Saturninus. It falsely implicates Martius and Quintus in the murder of Bassianus. ........Saturninus imprisons them. Judges later sentence them to death in spite of Titus’s pleas on their behalf. Lavinia, of course, cannot testify in their favor, for she has no tongue. When Titus, Lucius, and Titus’s brother Marcus discuss their options, the evil Aaron arrives and tells them that Saturninus will free the sons of Titus if Marcus, Lucius, or Titus cuts off his hand and sends it to the emperor. It is Titus, though, who allows Aaron to cut off his hand and take it to Saturninus. Within a half hour, however, the emperor returns the hand, together with the heads of Titus’s imprisoned sons, in a show of scorn and contempt. Titus orders his son Lucius to flee the city and enlist an army of Goths to overthrow Saturninus. The loss of his sons takes a severe toll on Titus: He begins to go mad. Then Lavinia informs Titus and others about her rape and mutilation by writing in sand with a stick held in her mouth. ........Meanwhile, Tamora has a baby. It is obviously Aaron’s because it has the dark complexion of a Moor. Worried that the emperor will find out about it, Tamora wants it killed. Aaron has other plans. First, he kills the baby’s midwife and nurse to keep secret the baby’s existence. Next, he substitutes a white baby for his own, then leaves with his child to go to the Goths to have them raise it. ........By this time, Lucius is marching on Rome with his army of Goths. Aaron and his baby, who have been captured, appear. Aaron agrees to tell all he knows if his child is allowed to live. It is now Titus’s turn for revenge. He cuts the throats of Tamora’s sons Demetrius and Chiron, then has a pie prepared of their remains. At his home, dressed as a cook, he serves the pie to Saturninus and Tamora, who are seated at a banquet table, unaware of recent events, notably the deaths of Demetrius and Chiron. With Titus is Lavinia, dressed in a veil. After welcoming the emperor and the queen, he bids them eat of the pie, which they do–heartily. Titus then kills Lavinia to put her out of her misery. When Tamora asks why he killed his own daughter, Titus tells her that the deed was really done by Demetrius and Chiron. “They ravish’d her, and cut away her tongue” (5. 3. 61), he explains. Saturninus then asks that Demetrius and Chiron be brought before him. But Titus says: Why, there they are both, baked in that pie;He flashes the knife he used to prepare the pie, then uses it to kill Tamora. In retaliation, Saturninus kills Titus, and Lucius kills Saturninus. Lucius takes command of Rome as the new emperor. There is unfinished business: Aaron. Lucius orders him to be buried up to his chest, then starved to death. . . Protagonist: Titus Andronicus Antagonists: Tamora, Aaron, Saturninus . Titus Andronicus: Noble Roman general who has won a long war against the Goths but lost many of his sons in battle. Although he is at first a reasonable man, events of the play transform him into a bedlamite bent on revenge. Saturninus: Conniving son of the late Emperor of Rome who succeeds his father after Titus Andronicus, citing his advancing age, declines to accept the throne. Bassianus: Brother of Saturninus; in love with Lavinia. Tamora: Queen of the Goths who is unrelenting in her desire to avenge the execution of her son Alarbus at the hands of her Roman captors. Near the end of the play, she unwittingly eats a meat pie made of the flesh of her dead sons. Aaron: A diabolical Moor, beloved of Tamora. Aaron is evil personified, but he has a redeeming quality: love for his child. Lavinia: Innocent daughter of Titus Andronicus. She is the victim of horrible crimes, including rape, the amputation of her hands, and the excision of her tongue. Marcus Andronicus: Tribune of the people and brother of Titus. Lucius, Quintus, Martius, Mutius: Sons of Titus Andronicus. Young Lucius: A boy, son of Lucius. Publius: Son of Marcus the tribune. Sempronius, Caius, Valentine: Kinsmen of Titus. Aemilius: A noble Roman Alarbus, Larbus, Demetrius, Chiron: Sons of Tamora A Captain, Tribune, Messenger, Clown Goths and Romans Minor Characters: Nurse, Senators, Tribunes, Officers, Soldiers, Attendants. . Setting........................................................................................................Buy Shakespeare Books .. The action of the play takes place in Italy–including Rome, a forest near Rome, and plains near Rome–after the Romans defeat an army of Goths (a Germanic people that frequently raided Roman provinces).Titus Andronicus is fictional, but it is set against real events that took place in approximately the Fourth and Fifth Centuries A.D. At that time, the Roman Empire was in decline and Goths from the north were pushing southward and threatening Rome and its provinces. Originally from Sweden, the Goths eventually settled in regions around the Baltic Sea and later the Black Sea. Those that moved eastward became known as Ostrogoths; those that moved westward were known as Visigoths. . Dates, Sources, and Type of Play . Date Written: Between 1590 and 1594 (probably 1593). Probable Main Sources: Shakespeare appears to have based Titus Andronicus on Hecuba, by Euripides (480?-406 B.C.); Thyestes and Troades, by Seneca (3 B.C.-65 A.D.); Metamorphoses, by Ovid (43 B.C.-A.D. 17). Shakespeare may also have imitated the blood-and-guts horror and brutality evident in The Spanish Tragedy, by Thomas Kyd (1558-1594).Seneca, a Roman dramatist and tutor to Emperor Nero, wrote plays that described in elaborate detail the grisly horror of murder and revenge. After Elizabethans began translating Seneca's works in 1559, writers read and relished them, then wrote plays imitating them. Shakespeare appears to have seasoned Titus Andronicus and a later play, Macbeth, with some of Seneca's ghoulish condiments. Type of Play: Titus Andronicus is a tragedy with characteristics of a black comedy. Number of Words in Complete Public-Domain Text: 21,798. Individual Copies for Schools: Pelican Edition (Low Cost) . Titus Andronicus: Shrewd Shakespeare Coup.....................................Classic Films on DVD, VHS By Michael J. Cummings..© 2004 . .......Titus Andronicus is evidence that William Shakepeare was a shrewd businessman and self-promoter. Aware that Elizabethan audiences had a huge appetite for bearbaiting, bullbaiting, dog-fighting, and cock-fighting, he may have decided to give the people what they wanted–another bloody spectacle–when he staged Titus. The play was immensely successful. .......When he wrote the play in his late twenties, he was struggling for recognition in a city that already had several established playwrights with enormous talent, such as Christopher Marlowe, Thomas Lodge, and George Peele. To get the attention of the theatre-going public, Shakespeare needed a play that would pack the audiences in. Violent revenge plays happened to be au courant at that time, especially those written after the manner of the ancient Roman playwright Seneca. Seneca's dramas were grisly, verily hemorrhaging with gore. So Shakespeare borrowed a few pages from Seneca’s bloody book, including part of the story line of Seneca’s play Thyestes and Troades. .......The plot of that play originated in a Greek myth about Thyestes, the son of Pelops of Mycenae. When Thyestes and his older brother, Atreus, were adults, Atreus became King of Mycenae after Pelops died. Atreus then drove his brother out of the city after the latter challenged him for the throne. One account of this tale says Thyestes had first seduced Atreus’s wife, Aërope, to gain possession of a golden lamb that conferred on its owner the rulership of Mycenae. .......When Thyestes left the city, he took with him Atreus’s child, Pleisthenes, and reared the boy. One day, he sent Pleisthenes on a mission to kill Atreus. But the murder plot was foiled and Pleisthenes was killed. Atreus did not immediately realize that his would-be murderer was his own son. .......However, after he discovered to his horror the identity of the assailant, Atreus hatched a plot to get even with his brother: He invited Thyestes to a banquet, pretending he was ready to reconcile with his brother. The main course turned out to be the cooked remains of the sons of Thyestes. Thyestes then laid a heavy curse on the house of Atreus, which lasted for generations. .......Shakespeare drew upon Seneca’s adaptation of this myth, as well as other works that discussed it, to create his own version of the story. The result was a horrific drama featuring decapitation, amputation, cannibalism, excision of a tongue, and rape. In other words, a bloody good play–with a meat pie to die for. .......Of course, many critics in later times–from the 18th Century onward–attacked the play as “Shakespeare’s worst” because of all the bloodletting; it was politically incorrect, unfit for sensitive audiences. Samuel Johnson (1709-1784) wrote of Titus: “The barbarity of the spectacles, and the general massacre which are here exhibited, can scarcely be conceived tolerable to any audience.” T.S. Eliot (1888-1965) said it was one of the “stupidest” plays in history. Joseph Sobran, a syndicated newspaper columnist in the U.S., assessed the play this way: "This is generally–more or less universally–regarded as Shakespeare’s worst play. It’s so much worse than anything else he wrote that many scholars have doubted that he wrote it. The critical consensus may be summed up in two words: it stinks." Shakespeare scholar Harold Bloom (1930- ), a humanities professor at Yale and New York University and author of Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, argues that "Titus Andronicus is ghastly bad. I can concede no intrinsic value to Titus Andronicus.” .......In my view, Titus Andronicus is a jolly good play, a running hyperbole which, like Voltaire’s Candide, gives us an unbelievable world in order to make the real world believable. In the real world, whether the real world of four centuries ago or the real world of today, people rape, poison, stab, shoot, lynch, torture, drown, cut off heads, cut out tongues, declare war. Often, we onlookers respond with passive acceptance: This is the way of things. We must accept the fact that there will always be “the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune”–or bombs and missiles–raining down on us. Shakespeare amplifies this point in a darkly hilarious scene in which Aaron tells Titus that he can rescue two of his sons in exchange for one of his hands, to be sent to the emperor. Titus replies: O gentle Aaron!Titus’s son Lucius, good boy that he is, then offers his hand in place of his father’s; Titus’s brother Marcus does the same. An argument breaks out over who will part with a hand. While Lucius and Marcus fetch an axe to sever one or the other’s hand, Titus says, “Come hither, Aaron; I'll deceive them both: / Lend me thy hand, and I will give thee mine” (3. 1. 193-194). Aaron chops off Titus’s hand. When Lucius and Marcus return, Titus coolly says, Good Aaron, give his majesty my hand:Clearly, Shakespeare knew the meaning of black humor long before that term was invented. By the way, during Shakespeare’s time, Titus Andronicus was one of his most popular plays–if not the most popular. At the end of the day, he went home with a jingling pocket, recognition, and a whole brainful of ideas for other tragedies. . Climax . The climax of a play or another narrative work, such as a short story or a novel, can be defined as (1) the turning point at which the conflict begins to resolve itself for better or worse, or as (2) the final and most exciting event in a series of events. The climax of Titus Andronicus occurs, according to the first definition, when Titus descends into madness in Act III. According to the second definition, the climax begins in the final act when Tamora dines on the meat pie containing the flesh of her sons. It continues when Titus kills Tamora, Saturninus kills Titus, and Lucius kills Saturninus and becomes the new emperor. .
Themes . Revenge becomes a rolling juggernaut that destroys all in its path. Once revenge is set in motion by the execution of Alarbus in the first act, the play becomes a bloodbath of revenge, with each side in the conflict taking turns murdering, maiming, immolating, and mutilating. The word revenge and its forms, such as revenged, occurs 34 times in the play, vengeance 7 times, vengeful twice, and avenge once. Words associated with revenge are spoken hundreds of times. They include blood (and its forms, such as bloody), 38; murder, 26; kill, 19; slaughter 3; slay, 2. Aaron tells Tamora that he is preoccupied with vengeance: "Blood and revenge are hammering in my head." Tamora, enraged by a plot against her, imposes revenge as a duty on her sons, telling them that: had you not by wondrous fortune come,In all the acts of vengeance in the play, the protagonist, Titus, outdoes everyone, serving Tamora and Saturninus a baked meat pie made of diced Demetrius and Chiron, the sons of Tamora. Presumably Titus used "corpse helper" to season the pie, for Tamora ate her fill of "the flesh that she herself hath bred." Betrayal is the handmaiden of power. In good faith, Titus yields the throne to Saturninus. Saturninus then turns against Titus. There are those who do evil for evil’s sake. Aaron delights in the bloody mayhem in the play, no motive required. After cutting off Titus's hand–the price Titus had to pay to secure a promise for the return of his sons–Aaron says: I go, Andronicus: and for thy handAnd near the end of the play, he observes: Tut, I have done a thousand dreadful thingsHis actions carry on the tradition of the malevolent Duke of Gloucester in an earlier Shakespeare play, Richard III, and foreshadow the machinations of the diabolical Iago in a later Shakespeare play, Othello. . Imagery: Nature Metaphors, Allusions . In spite of the gruesome plot, Titus Andronicus contains much beautiful imagery, spoken often, ironically, by villains. For example, Aaron hails Tamora’s ascendancy to the queenship with nature metaphors and an allusion to Apollo, the sun god, driving his chariot across the sky: Now climbeth Tamora Olympus’4 top,In Act II, Tamora speaks nature metaphors to charm Aaron. She also alludes to Aeneas, the Trojan War refugee who was the mythical founder of Rome, and his relationship with the Carthaginian queen, Dido : My lovely Aaron, wherefore look’st thou sad,There are other allusions to Greek mythology or to events in Roman history. For example, after Titus kills his own son, Mutius, Marcus Andronicus pleads with Titus to allow him to bury Mutius honorably, saying, The Greeks upon advice did bury Ajax7After the rape and mutilation of Lavinia, Titus and Marcus both use allusions as they attempt to discover the names of her attackers: TITUS ANDRONICUS Give signs, sweet girl, for here are none but friends,Later, Saturninus tells his court that Titus has written messages, attached to arrows, to the heavens for a redress of his grievances: And now he writes to heaven for his redress:Imagery: Ugly Beauty Ironically, Shakespeare sometimes wraps repulsive images in pleasing ones or tucks them into rhythmically pleasing lines. Lucius reports in Act I that Alarbus’ limbs are lopp’d,In Act II, Martius, upon discovering Bassianus dead in a pit, observes: Upon his bloody finger he doth wearIn Act II, Marcus greets Lavinia–whose hands have just been cut off–with these lines: Speak, gentle niece, what stern ungentle hands . Titus Andronicus introduces an evil Moor named Aaron who displays goodness near the end when he pleads for his child's life. Othello introduces an upright and righteous Moor who displays evil when he suspects his wife of infidelity and, at the end of the play, kills her. Like Othello, Aaron is the brunt of racist comments. A Moor was a Muslim of mixed Arab and Berber descent. Berbers were North African natives who eventually accepted Arab customs and Islam after Arabs invaded North Africa in the Seventh Century A.D. The term has been used to refer in general to Muslims of North Africa and to Muslim conquerors of Spain. The word Moor derives from a Latin word, Mauri, used to name the residents of the ancient Roman province of Mauritania in North Africa. To refer to Othello as a "black Moor" is not to commit a redundancy, for there are white Moors as well as black Moors, the latter mostly of Sudanese origin. Before performing a bloody play such as Titus Andronicus, actors in Shakespeare's day filled vessels such as pigs' bladders with blood and concealed them beneath their costumes. Onstage, they had only to pound a fist against a bladder to release the blood and simulate a gruesome death. Study
Questions and Essay Topics
Notes 1.
Sacred . . . joys: Titus refers to the tomb (sacred receptacle) of his
sons (joys).
|
| Film | Director | Actors |
| Antony and Cleopatra (1974) | Trevor Nunn, John Schoffield | Richard Johnson, Janet Suzman |
| As You Like It (1937) NR | Paul Czinner | Henry Ainley, Felix Aylmer |
| Hamlet (1948) NR | Laurence Olivier | Laurence Olivier, Jean Simmons |
| Hamlet (1990) NR | Kevin Kline | Kevin Kline |
| Hamlet (1991) PG | Franco Zeffirelli | Mel Gibson, Glenn Close |
| Hamlet (1996) PG-13 | Kenneth Branagh | Kenneth Branagh, |
| Hamlet (1964) NR | John Gielgud, Bill Colleran | Richard Burton, Hume Cronyn |
| Hamlet (1964) NR | Grigori Kozintsev | Innokenti Smoktunovsky |
| Hamlet (2000) NR | Campbell Scott, Eric Simonson | Campbell Scott, Blair Brown |
| Henry V (1989) PG-13 | Kenneth Branagh | Kenneth Branaugh, Derek Jacobi |
| Henry V( 1946) NR | Laurence Olivier | Leslie Banks, Felix Aylmer |
| Julius Caesar (1950) NR | David Bradley | Charlton Heston |
| Julius Caesar (1953) NR | Joseph L. Mankiewicz | Marlon Brando, James Mason |
| Julius Caesar (1970) G | Stuart Burge | Charlton Heston, Jason Robards |
| King Lear (1970) | Grigori Kozintsev | Yuri Yarvet |
| King Lear (1971) | Peter Brook | Cyril Cusack, Susan Engel |
| King Lear (1974) NR | Edwin Sherin | James Earl Jones |
| King Lear (1976) NR | Tony Davenall | Patrick Mower, Ann Lynn |
| King Lear (1984) NR | Michael Elliott | Laurence Olivier, Colin Blakely |
| King Lear (1997) NR | Richard Eyre | Ian Holm |
| Love's Labour's Lost (2000) | Kenneth Branagh | Kenneth Branagh, Alicia Silverstone |
| Macbeth (1971) R | Roman Polanski | Jon Finch, Francesca Annis |
| Macbeth (1978) NR | Philip Casson | Ian McKellen, Judy Dench |
| The Merchant of Venice (2004) R | Michael Radford | Al Pacino, Jeremy Irons |
| The Merchant of Venice (2001) NR | Christ Hunt, Trevor Nunn | David Bamber, Peter De Jersey |
| The Merry Wives of Windsor (1970) NR | Leon Charles, Gloria Grahame | |
| Midsummer Night's Dream (1996) PG-13 | Adrian Noble | Lindsay Duncan, Alex Jennings |
| A Midsummer Night's Dream (1999) | Michael Hoffman | Kevin Kline, Michelle Pfeiffer |
| Much Ado About Nothing (1993) PG 13 | Kenneth Branaugh | Branaugh, Emma Thompson |
| Othello (1990) NR | Trevor Nunn | Ian McKellen, Michael Grandage |
| Othello (1955) NR | Orson Welles | Orson Welles |
| Ran (1985) Japanese Version of King Lear R | Akira Kurosawa | Tatsuya Nakadai, Akira Terao |
| Richard II (2001) NR | John Farrell | Matte Osian, Kadina de Elejalde |
| Richard III (1912) NR | André Calmettes, James Keane | Robert Gemp, Frederick Warde |
| Richard III - Criterion Collection (1956) NR | Laurence Olivier | Laurence Olivier, Ralph Richardson |
| Richard III (1995) R | Richard Loncraine | Ian McKellen, Annette Bening |
| Romeo and Juliet (1968) G | Franco Zeffirelli | Leonard Whiting, Olivia Hussey |
| Romeo and Juliet (1996) PG-13 | Baz Luhrmann | Leonardo DiCaprio, Claire Danes |
| Romeo and Juliet (1976) NR | Joan Kemp-Welch | Christopher Neame, Ann Hasson |
| The Taming of the Shrew (1967) | Franco Zeffirelli | Elizabeth Taylor, Richard Burton |
| The Taming of the Shrew (1976) | Kirk Browning | Raye Birk, Earl Boen, Ron Boussom |
| The Taming of The Shrew (1983) NR | Franklin Seales, Karen Austin, | |
| The Tempest PG | Paul Mazursky | John Cassavetes, Gena Rowlands |
| The Tempest (1998) | Jack Bender | Peter Fonda, John Glover, Harold Perrineau, |
| Throne of Blood (1961) Macbeth in Japan NR | Akira Kurosawa | Toshirô Mifune, Isuzu Yamada |
| Twelfth Night (1996) PG | Trevor Nunn | Helena Bonham Carter |
| The Winter's Tale (2005) NR | Greg Doran | Royal Shakespeare Company |