|
Summary and Discussion of Key Evidence Linking Shakespeare to Catholicism . Circumstantial Evidence Suggests Shakespeare Held Fast To Roman Catholicism but Foolproof Documentation Lacking . By Michael J. Cummings..© 2005 . .......Why does the question matter? It matters because Shakespeare was the most important playwright in the English language. Any glimpse into his private mind, any glimpse into the core of his beliefs, can reveal new insights about why he wrote what he did about God, religion, and the universe—and can thus give us a deeper understanding of the characters in his tragedies, comedies, and histories. They are, after all, ourselves. .......We can say this much for certain about Shakespeare: He was the son of a man and a woman who actively practiced Roman Catholicism before and at the time of their marriage during the reign of Queen Mary I, the daughter of King Henry VIII and his first wife, Catherine of Aragon. Mary, who ruled England from 1553 to 1558, espoused the Catholic religion of her mother as the one true faith, renouncing the Protestant Church of England (Anglican Church)—founded by her father—and imposing severe penalties (including death sentences) on Protestants who refused to follow her example. .......Whether William Shakespeare’s parents, John Shakespeare and Mary Arden Shakespeare, were Catholics at the time of William’s birth in 1564 is open to speculation. Here is why: Upon the death of Queen Mary in 1558, the Protestant daughter of Henry VIII and his second wife, Anne Boleyn, acceded to the English throne as Elizabeth I and recognized the Protestant faith as the official state religion. Using parliamentary laws approved early in Elizabeth’s reign, the government required citizens to attend the Protestant services of the Church of England under penalty of a heavy fine or worse. Holders of religious and municipal offices had to swear an oath of allegiance to the queen as the supreme religious authority in England to avoid loss of their positions and, in some cases, to avoid imprisonment or execution. Consequently, the ability to succeed in the Elizabethan world—and sometimes merely to stay alive—depended on one’s willingness to renounce Catholicism publicly. .......Although the queen generally frowned on intrusion into the privacy of the home, there were times when government spies poked their noses through any window, or across any threshold, to ferret out religious nonconformists. In fact, at times, Elizabeth's secret police would follow a suspected Catholic anywhere and would check every closet, every attic, and every cellar in his house to turn up incriminating evidence. Topcliffe: Elizabeth's Ruthless Spy .......The most notorious Catholic-tracker in Elizabeth's service was Richard Topcliffe, who maintained a torture chamber in his house. There, he subjected captives to excruciating agonies. One of these captives was Robert Southwell (1561-1595), a Jesuit priest and poet who lived and moved in
England's Catholic underground. After arresting Southwell in 1592 while Southwell was saying mass, Topcliffe tortured him in at least 10 separate sessions, but the priest refused to disavow his religion. Stubborn Loyalists .......In spite of the dangers facing them, many Britons stubbornly remained loyal to the “old faith,” as Roman Catholicism came to be known after Henry VIII broke with Rome in the 1530's. But what about Shakespeare's parents? Three years before William's birth, a Protestant named John Bretchgirdle
was appointed pastor of Stratford’s Holy Trinity Church. As Stratford became “Protestantized,” John Shakespeare publicly accepted the Church of England. Records indicate that he even participated in remaking the church and the chapel in the local guild hall into Protestant houses of worship between 1560 and 1571. Images were by painted over; stained-glass windows were replaced; and the elaborate
trappings of Catholic ritual were removed. But strong evidence—outlined in numbered examples below—suggests that John and Mary remained Catholic in secret. If so, William Shakespeare grew up inculcated with Catholic teaching. 1...John Shakespeare's Recusancy Shakespeare’s father, John, was identified in 1592 as a recusant, a Catholic who refused to attend the services of the Church of England. However, no one has firmly established why he missed the services. The possibility exists that his absence was due to reasons unconnected with his religious beliefs. On the other hand, one may fairly ask why he was accused of recusancy instead of simple truancy. Of course, one may also fairly ask whether William Shakespeare would have followed the example of his father if the latter had remained Catholic. 2...Mary Shakespeare's Catholicity Shakespeare’s mother, Mary Arden Shakespeare, belonged to a fiercely loyal Catholic family not far from Stratford. A member of that family, Edward Arden (whose father was a cousin of Mary), befriended Catholics—including a priest named Hugh Hall, who lived in disguise on Edward Arden’s property—and opposed the religious policies of the Crown. The government eventually caught up with him and accused him of plotting against the queen. He was executed him in 1583, and his head was impaled on a stake atop London Bridge. However, this evidence fails to demonstrate that Mary Arden Shakespeare was as fixed in her religious views as Edward Arden. If she had decided to bend to the will of the Crown rather than to follow the example of Edward, William might well have decided to walk in her footsteps. 3...William Shakespeare's Schooling When he was an elementary student at the King’s New School in Stratford, William Shakespeare’s schoolteachers included at least two Roman Catholics, Simon Hunt and John Cottom, who may have taught or promoted Catholic ideas. A third teacher, Thomas Jenkins, may also have been a Catholic. However, Shakespeare’s plays suggest that as a boy he used the Protestant Geneva Bible, published in English on the European continent between 1557 and 1560 and in England in 1576. It is possible that Shakespeare was also familiar with the first English translation of the Catholic Bible, the Douay-Rheims version. The New Testament of that Bible became available in England in 1582 and the Old Testament, between 1609 and 1610. 4...William Shakespeare's Wedding John Frith, who presided at Shakespeare’s marriage to Anne Hathaway in 1582 in the village of Temple Grafton (about four miles from Stratford), was identified by the government in 1586 as a Roman Catholic priest even though he had outwardly affected Protestant ways. It is reasonable to speculate, therefore, that Shakespeare chose the church in Temple Grafton as the site of his wedding, not the then Protestant church in his hometown, because he wanted to marry in a Catholic ceremony. 5...Shakespeare and Southwell: Were They Spiritual Kin? See Topcliffe: Elizabeth's Reichsführer, above. 6...The Mysterious Document Hidden in the Rafters A document found in John Shakespeare’s home—in which William lived as a boy and a teenager, then as a married man with his wife until 1597, when he bought his own home in Stratford—contained wording identical to that in a pamphlet distributed by Edmund Campion (1540-1581), a Jesuit priest. The pamphlet was an English
translation of an Italian document written by the Catholic Archbishop of Milan, Charles Borromeo (1538-1584). Borromeo (in Italian, Carlo Borromeo), a member of the 7...Was Shakespeare "Shakeshafte"? As a teenager, William Shakespeare may have practiced the Catholic faith under the name "William Shakeshafte" while working for and living with Alexander Hoghton (also spelled de Hoghton and Houghton) and his family in a sprawling, castle-like manor house in northwest England near the towns of Preston, Blackburn, and Darwen in the county of Lancashire. Known as Hoghton Tower and alternately Hoghton Castle, the manor house was a hotbed of Catholic activity, with priests (such as Edmund Campion) or aspiring priests using it as a kind of way station while traveling to and from the European continent. That Shakespeare was an employee (a servant or perhaps a tutor of children ) in the Hoghton household is based on the following information: A...Hoghton identified William Shakeshafte as an employee of his. The evidence in Points A to K above has been discussed by various writers over the years. In 1923 Edmund Chambers was the first researcher to consider the possibility that Shakeshafte was Shakespeare. In a 1937 book, Shakespeare's Warwickshire and the Unknown Years, Oliver Baker, of Stratford, pursued this theory.
Chambers continued his research after the Baker book, and many other researchers—including Ernst A.J. Honigmann, in Shakespeare: The Lost Years—followed up on the research of both Edmunds and Baker. The combined research indicates that the Hoghton home was a safe house for Catholics, where William Shakespeare (if he indeed worked there) could practice Catholicism—or at least retain
Catholic beliefs—without fear of discovery. Daring theorists have even suggested that William himself originally intended to go to the European continent to study for the priesthood. 8...The Gunpowder Plot and a Possible Shakespeare-Campion Connection In November 1605, defiant recusants plotted to kill King James I, the queen, their oldest son, and members of Parliament by exploding barrels of gunpowder beneath the House of Lords and the adjacent royal palace. However, before the conspirators could execute their plan—scheduled for Nov. 5—government authorities arrested one of the plotters, Guy Fawkes, after receiving a tip. They tortured him until he disclosed the details of the conspiracy, which became known in English history as the Gunpowder Plot. What makes this incident relevant in research about Shakespeare's religion is that the leader of the conspiracy, Robert Catesby (1573-1605), and other conspirators lived in the Stratford region. Catesby's father, Sir William Catesby, once hosted Edmund Campion (1540-1581), the Jesuit priest mentioned in Numbers 6 and 7 above, at the Catesby home in Lapworth, Warwickshire. There is speculation that William Shakespeare once met Campion and approved of his activities. 9...The Empty Pew Although the English government maintained records of persons attending Protestant services, no records exist indicating that William Shakespeare registered as a member of the Church of England, as required, while he lived off and on in London. 10...The Empty Pew 2: Shakespeare's Daughter Identified as a Recusant On May 5, 1606, the government identified Shakespeare’s daughter Susanna as a recusant for failing to attend an Easter service of the Church of England at which she was supposed to receive holy communion. If Susanna was indeed a recusant, one may fairly speculate that her father, William, reared her a Catholic. Of course, it is possible she was her own guiding star on matters of conscience—or missed the Easter service because she was suffering from a bad headache. 11...Blackfriars Gatehouse: Catholic Haven or Investment Property? On March 10, 1613, Shakespeare purchased Blackfriars Gatehouse on Puddle Dock Hill in London from Henry Walker for £140. Presumably, Shakespeare planned to rent the property and perhaps live there during his last days as a London playwright. However, the gatehouse was said to be a hiding place for London Catholics, complete with tunnels. Whether Shakespeare bought the property to aid Catholics or to augment his income and provide lodging for himself cannot be determined. The Folger Shakespeare Library in Washington, D.C., holds Shakespeare's copy of the deed of purchase for the gatehouse. 12...Anglican Minister's Testimony A statement affirming that Shakespeare died a Catholic was written, ironically, by an Anglican minister, Archdeacon Richard Davies, of Gloucestershire. In the late 1600's, he wrote notes added to a reference work—a collection of biographies written by the Rev. William Fulman—that said Shakespeare "dyed a Papyst [died a Papist]." A Papist was a Catholic loyal to the pope and the church of Rome. However, the reliability of Davies' information is dubious, for in the same notes he also says Shakespeare in his youth stole deer and other animals from the property of Sir Thomas Lucy (1532-1600) of Charlecote, Warwickshire. Many Shakespeare scholars (but not all of them) have since labeled this story apocryphal. According to an article first published in 1918 in Old and Sold Antiques Digest, the Fulman manuscript is in the possession of Oxford University's Corpus Christi College. 13...Shakespeare's Plays and Their Catholic Characters Numerous passages in Shakespeare’s plays indicate that he had a deep understanding of Catholicism, its tenets, and its rituals. Moreover, he often cast Catholic characters in a favorable light in conflicts involving moral principles, unjust traditions and practices, and theological and philosophical issues. Among these Catholic characters and the plays in which they appear are Hamlet, in Hamlet, Prince of Denmark; Aemilia, the abbess in The Comedy of Errors; Friar Laurence, in Romeo and Juliet; Friar Francis, in Much Ado About Nothing; and Thomas More, in Sir Thomas More (a play believed to be of joint authorship, with passages written or revised by Shakespeare). However, Shakespeare also depicted Catholic characters in an unfavorable light, including Joan of Arc, in Henry VI Part I; Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, in Henry VIII; the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop Ely, in Henry V; and the heartless aristocrats in The Merchant of Venice, who ridicule Shylock, a Jewish moneylender, and force him to become a Christian. 14...Shakespeare's Outcasts: Catholic Surrogates? Shakespeare populates many of his plays with outcasts. If Shakespeare had clung to Catholicism, he may have been using these outcasts to symbolize his own status as a religious pariah. Among his outcast characters and the plays in which they appear are Duke Senior and his outlaws, in As You Like It; Prospero, in The Tempest; Posthumus Leonatus, in Cymbeline; Timon, in Timon of Athens; and Cordelia, the Earl of Kent, and Edgar, in King Lear. It is even possible (if one wishes to delve further into sheer speculation) that Shakespeare deliberately made Shylock, the Jewish moneylender in The Merchant of Venice, a sympathetic character because of his outcast religious status. Few Jews lived in England in Shakespeare’s time, for the government had expelled everyone espousing the Jewish faith under a 1290 decree. However, a small number of Jews remained in England over the centuries, pretending to accept Christianity. In the Elizabethan and Jacobean eras, publicly professing Christianity meant a Jew had to pledge allegiance to the Church of England, like a Catholic. .......None of these 14 examples of evidence is strong enough on its own to withstand intelligent rebuttal. Indeed, several examples are mere conjecture. However, considered collectively, these examples form an impressive body of circumstantial evidence to make the case for a Catholic Shakespeare. My own view is that Shakespeare was probably a lifelong Catholic, but I readily acknowledge that not enough documentation exists to prove that he was. It is unlikely that such documentation will come through exhaustive exegesis of his complete works; for, as Shakespeare himself wrote, “The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose” (Antonio to Bassanio, Act I, Scene III, Line 99, The Merchant of Venice). In other words, any researcher can bend the meaning of virtually any Shakespeare passage to serve his own viewpoint. .......Perhaps the day will come when some attic—or some library packed with crumbling yellow documents—will yield a paper in Shakespeare’s own hand that attests to his religious beliefs. Until then, the debate over his religious beliefs will go on while Shakespeare sleeps the eternal sleep inside his Stratford tomb in a Protestant church that once was Catholic. 
Play
Director
Actors
More To Explore
|
Contact & About
|
